Confucianism to CDMs: The Summer Institute Begins

10 Jul

What ties together CDM negotiations, Confucian approaches to environmental stewardship, hydroelectric projects in the Mekong River basin and societal strategies for reducing emissions? Not much, on the surface. But in the first two days of lectures and workshops of PSIGCC 2009, certain themes have emerged. Responsibility and equity are two such themes; they have wound throughout every debate of the Institute so far.

When governments send their representatives to Copenhagen this winter for the next round of climate talks, they may very well engage in similar debates as the program participants. Led by GWU Law’s David Freestone, one workshop quickly showed that CDM negotiations will break down without a measure of equity – both Annex 1 nor developing nations will be forced to make concessions in order to achieve meaningful progress. This workshop, it turned out, was an ideal segue into a discussion on ethics led by Dr. Paul Wapner. His overarching question: “How can we take this moral sentiment and turn it into a form of governance like law and economic incentives” touched off a discussion about how responsibility and equality are not merely abstract moral concepts; they may actually be the foundation for forward progress on climate change.


Dr. David Freestone Leads the Debate on Envrionmental Law


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: